challenger minerals CGJ.v Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : challenger minerals CGJ.v

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: tonythetiger who wrote (3)	2/13/1997 8:45:00 AM
From: dan wynne	of 71

Mr Watier: good to hear you heard similar. I spoke w/Alan Barry, their onshore spokesperson, last Friday. He indicated that review of all the 3700-odd samples indicated several long anomalies, and that CGJ "had discovered" that their was, coincidentally, an area right in the middle of one that had not been sampled, and that they would be getting either 200 or 400 more samples there. coincidence ? he also told me that Highwood Resources had invited Bailey over to, in confidence, see their data, from a structure that Barry claims appears to extend onto CGJ property, based on CGJ's geochem data. I have had twice-monthly conversations with Barry or Baily for several months and get new pictures every time. What other information do you have ? dan wynne

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next