Ron, I'm with you for the long term on this one, but think that to characterize expectations of a PR as "dreams" is unwarranted.
The company, in its Jan. 19 PR referred to the "variety and import" of the announcements to be made. Certainly, one would not expect important announcements to be confined to a room of people in L.A., for legal reasons if no other. Hence, I'm still here expecting a PR from the company, at least for CYA purposes. At this point, I am concerned about the company's handling of this matter. Three or four PR's about the "by invitation only" symposium? Why bother, if it were to be a private affair?
My biggest concern is that the company arranges for adequate working capital on a going-forward basis. This is what I am most interested in hearing about now.
As far as Chris goes, I was most amused that some were ready to sell based upon his report from the meeting. While his efforts are appreciated, I for one would have expected a more organized effort from someone who has an investment in the company. Was the panel not introduced? At what time did the proceedings start?, etc., etc. To be sure, Chris isn't accountable to me or anyone else here. My point being that anyone ready to sell based only upon unconfirmed posts in SI are not "investors".
Finally, I note the strong buying today that began at the $0.50 level. Perhaps the sky isn't falling after all. |
