SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (51675)3/5/1999 12:25:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) of 1573844
 
What the heck, how about another pro-Intel reply.
"Name:
Richard L. Buckmaster
Location:
Dallas
Occupation:
Independent Technology Consultant

The chip ID is equivalent to Microsoft adding an agent to
Windows that reports every user action directly back to
Microsoft. This is the first step onto the "slippery slope" of
uncontrolled, unauthorized, electronic monitoring of the
home PC user by industry giants.

I have chosen to eliminate all Intel based products from
my offerings and am recommending that my customers
not purchase Intel based products until this trend is
reversed.

It is no accident that AMD sold more CPUs than Intel last
month. I believe Intel has made a huge blunder here
and they will quickly suffer the wrath of the consummer.
There is absolutely no customer benefit to the chip ID
technology. Suggesting it improves e-commerce security
is rediculous. When used in e-commerce, the chip ID is
analogous to embossing PIN codes on ATM cards.

Hey Intel! You're mistaken if you think the buying public
will accept this without a fight. The CPU chip ID will go
down in business history as one of the greatest product
development mistakes ever conceived. Within a year,
you will be producing AMD clone chips."

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext