Hello everyone,
I am using this response as my first post to this thread. I have been following this thread since it's insecption, and it is getting so interesting, I decided to join s.i. and join in the discussion. My response has to do with patent protection and SR's release of information on their technology (white paper, DQ report, news releases). People who have speculated about their strategy have suggested some of the information is intended to mislead or confuse. I will use George's statement as an example:
"There appears to be no use of or even the need to use multiple LaGuerre orders or any kind of stacking of photons in three-dimensional space. If photons were being stacked in independent Laguerre Orders, as the entrepreneuers claim, then there would need to be an independent electrical stimulus for each order. Where is the unique role that ORS will play? Hence, where are the cattle?"
I am not at the technical level of most (if not all) of the people on this thread, but I have a decent since of logic and am at least smart enough to follow what's going on. That said, my feeling is that Dr. Palmer's figuring out a way of to use multiple LaGuerre orders for the stacking of photons in 3 deminsional space IS the breakthrough. To accomplish this feat he needed a contraption that could transmit this technology (stabelized laser), and that is what the patent is for. Even if someone invented a better mouse trap, I'm not sure they would have a way of modulating the information onto the beam as good as SR's. In other words, I think that what SR says is basically true, but they are not telling everything (like the solutions to the Maxwell equations).
What do you think? Don't laugh too hard if I'm way off base. This is my first post, and I don't want to look like a chump. |
