Perhaps you could prove me wrong when I call you a "deluded liar" by pointing out to this thread the precise dates.
Ah, the pot speaks to the kettle! Since I've pointed out at least two outright lies you have spoken in the last several days, and you have failed to prove that they are not, why should I bother? However, if you would like to begin the apologies, I might consider looking into it. On the other hand, those dates shouldn't be hard to find.
for telling you to ignore the hypsters of the era who were screaming you should buy at 15 and 18 dollars a share. I guess they'll never forgive me for telling it like it was and is. Johnny,
Well, "Dicky" (since we're getting comfortable now), I believe it was also you who was screaming to investors that they shouldn't have bought at 8 or 10... before it went to 24. I guess they'll never forgive you for costing them some great profits, either. The plain fact is you made SO MANY wild predictions, at least some of them HAD to come true.
If I had a financial interest in Q shares
IF? Are you now stating that your 'admission' of owning a financial interest in Eby's restricted shares was ANOTHER lie?
But no... I seem to remember that Eby himself confirmed it. He certainly admitted to knowing you, and at least from my perspective considered you the scum of the earth.
Hey, Satriano, if anyone wants to buy into a company where the 2 top officers take 5% of every sales dollar (actually I believe more than the entire profit of the company) that is paid to Quigley, they should definitely do so. It takes a real "Loonie" to defend that company.
You are certainly entitled to your opinion. Even the most mentally deficient people in this country are entitled to that.
If you are not a paid tout then and now, you sure act like one.
And how is that? I would think that paid touts would say positive things about the company, perhaps encourage people to buy the stock on occasion. You seem to be confusing making fun of you with "defending the company".
Here's a tip: when you read something that someone has written, try reading what they have actually written, not what you would have liked them to have written. This is how communication works amongst people who have all their marbles.
There's no reason for me to continue this argument other than the enjoyment of it. Anyone who is sane and has read my messages over the years knows that if I were a "Q plant" I would have been fired a long time ago. The same is true of most of the dozens of other "conspirators" that you have accused over the years.
Perhaps we shall have to ressurrect ENDSQC (The Evil and Nasty Doylestown Society of Quigley Conspirators).
J.S. |
