Nuinsco Resources (NWI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: geo in vancouver who wrote (1273)	3/7/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (3) of 5821

GiD I was vague in my question "Zn in Sudbury ores", e.g. noritic sub-layer, embayment, off-set quartz-diorite or footwall not unrelated VMS deposits in the area. We have already discussed the komats (e.g. Raglan) ultra-mafic hosted erosional features in basalt flows. This is what happens when EC pulls us so far off-topic that we are no longer discussing anything of any relevance to NWI. I would still like the metal numbers from EC, and are we down to one paper that he cannot find that was published in 1948! Am I the only one that finds this sudden shortage of info somewhat out of character for EC! There is plenty of information available on the NWI prospect to rule out several deposit models (e.g. porphyry, VMS). It is not too early to suggest some models that may be suitable (e.g. some form of magmatic sulfide), as a matter of pertinent discussion. It is however too early to suggest an economic deposit of any size. All in fun, until someone aims to deliberately mislead through ignorance or action. Appreciate your posts. 1King I figured being a Sunday we might get away with a little more of EC's BS. All business on Monday A.M. I Promise!

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next