SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: djia101362 who wrote (17349)3/7/1999 4:46:00 PM
From: Rusty Johnson  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Your point is well taken ...

the differences are:

1. OS/2 only had the support of IBM.

2. OS/2 wasn't "free".

3. OS/2 wasn't open source.

4. Linux has the support of IBM, SGI, HWP, SUNW, INTC, ORCL, IFMX, CPQ, DELL ...

5. Linux is not $89.99 per copy.

6. Linux is constantly improved by the best OS programmers in the world.

7. It depends on how "superiority" is defined but Linux is more stable than Windows NT or Windows 98. That is a fact. It is impossible to convince a stockholder of the MSFT cult that Linux is superior. Try getting a Jehovah's Witness to convert to Catholicism.

It appears that the client server model is winning. Bill's view of bloatware on everyone's desktop appears to be losing ground. That does not mean MSFT can't make money.

They have broadband and e-commerce too ... and I look for the stock to rise when the trial is behind them. But two and a half times the growth rate is too pricey for me right now.

I'll buy more SUNW, NOVL, AMAT ... the leaders.

Best of luck.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext