OK, since you already have that information, pls share with the rest of us who are still in the dark.
I didn't say I had that information. But even if there were foreign shareholdership, I would be only be distressed if it were a controlling or more than 10% ownership.
If you hold any stock then you must surely realize how impotent you are as a shareholder when it comes to telling the company what to do.
So calling the Fed a puppet on the strings of its foreign master might be just a bit premature, maybe?? Just because no one has the data one way or another does not mean you should automatically think the FRB is no longer owned or operated by Americans accountable to the US political system.
I am sorry but I am still imperfect......however, I would be interested in meeting this great person you speak of who is capable of eliminating personal bias.
Well, I would like to meet that person as well so I can call him a liar... :0) Listen, I don't expect total objectivity, but you seem to be looking for the questions to the answers you have found. And you are assuming that your answers are correct.
I don't look so much at who owns the bank, but the policies that the bank follows and how it relates to the interests of the United States. And I have seen no OBSERVABLE evidence of policies by FRB that threaten to subjugate our sovereignty to foreign financiers.
In fact, it seems we're the ones currently pulling the financial strings in the world.
Regards,
Ron
|
