Oh yeah? You're rebarbative, so there.
As to my "endorsement of Ian's obscene description", you wouldn't be putting words in my mouth again, would you? You little liar. Or are you a Marxist? Engaging in the Rev. Pilch's "leftist ad hominem" attack, as usual?
I don't even know what Ian's description of Reagan's condition was. I do know, though, that according to Donald Regan's book, Reagan was a vastly diminished presence in the White House after the assassination attempt, which took place very early on. Donald Regan is also not widely known as a Marxist.
I wouldn't deny the effectiveness of the Reagan administration, but giving Reagan credit for everything is about as ridiculous as blaming Clinton for everything bad that's happened for the past 30 years. Contra drug running through Mena, it's Clinton's fault. Reagan administration loses atomic secrets to China, it's Clinton's fault. Hundreds of billions down the tubes in the S&L fiasco, including a cool $2billion at VP son's Silverado, it's Clinton's fault. The west is going down the tubes, and it's all Clinton's fault. Whatever you say, JBL.
P.S. You're full of crap. |
