Yes, editing "George Bush" to "President Bush" is just a simple spelling correction Bill. You're still flogging the "President Bush was never deposed line, too. Wasn't always like that, though, was it Bill?
While you're busy pontificating on the conflicts in your troubled life, how about an answer to my question.
Where and when did George Bush lie under oath? (Remember that hateful wild ranting accusatory post of yours?) Just wondering.
Look, I'm not your shrink. Go rant to someone else.
Just tell me when and where George Bush lied under oath, as you have alleged.
So, you admit that you invented that stuff about Bush lying under oath. Is that what you're telling me? Are you telling this thread that you are a liar? Or are you telling this thread that you are ignorant?
Nice tone. Again, take that to your shrink.
What's this "I'll get back to you" stuff? You made a declarative statement and now you have to go back and look it up? Why don't you tell us what you meant by your statement that Bush lied under oath? Was it your lie or your ignorance that produced that bit of mythology?
A person with integrity would have admitted he made up the statement, "and George Bush lied under oath."
And an apology for being so blindly partisan that you lied to make a point would be in order.
But liars beget liars, I guess. And people with no integrity are respected by the same. That explains your hateful existence.
Have you no shame? Cease with the endless drivel and equivocating.
You have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have lied when you said: "and Bush lied under oath." You can't even point to an instance where Bush was PUT UNDER OATH!
Case closed.
You lied. Admit it.
Where is your integrity?
And you complain about people attacking you? Who said this?
You did. You're a real piece of work, liar.
You lied about Bush lying under oath. You have no shame or integrity to admit it. And thank you for the "apology".
That was spread over maybe 5-10 messages, over 2 hours, while I looked things up. Want to give me the lecture on juvenile taunting again, Bill? I slipped up and called you a piece of garbage in there. Well, it was a slip at the time, but also the truth. Peripherally, there was this cute little email I got from you sometime after that polite exchange:
I just did a search on "liar". Haven't found even one instance where I directly called you one. Found several where I pointed out your action, the LIE. But not direct name calling. I find that offensive and so does SI.
So, knock it off. Keep it at a little higher level.
SI search just doesn't cut it, does it, Bill? And of course, creative Bill would never, ever engage in direct name calling. I stand by the "garbage" characterization.
Walsh thought he could make a perjury case against Bush, but then there were these pardons. The facts of which I documented at the time, you little liar. Well known Marxist William Safire had some other problems with Bush in that era:
Back in the Bush Administration, press reports revealed the corrupt use of U.S. Government grain guarantees to help Saddam Hussein build his war machine before he surprised us by invading Kuwait. When the Justice Department shyly turned away, the need arose for independent counsel to explore "Iraqgate."
No way, said George Bush, already burned by a special prosecution of Iran-contra. His Attorney General instead used a patsy prosecutor until the Independent Counsel Act lapsed. |
