SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth E. De Paul who wrote (7883)2/13/1997 10:55:00 PM
From: Joe Antol   of 42771
 
Maybe this will help Ken. Name X'd out by me. And I don't see CalPERS *not* moving either <G>.
=====================================================================
At 06:15 PM 2/13/97 -0600, you wrote:
>Joe -
>
>Greetings from WI! I'm one of the "quiet one's" from the SI board. >I have no doubt the boys at Novell have been reading your excellent >comments for some time too -- unfortunately, they don't a clue!
>
>Just wanted to let you know that SWIB has been involved in >shareholder rights issues for some time. While not as "public" in >their demeanor as CALPERS, I have no doubt that SWIB is very >aggressive in its meetings with management -- the long term returns >of SWIB's investments speak to that. Just like you, SWIB PLAYS TO >WIN!!!
>
>I wouldn't be surprised if SWIB and CALPERS are already in >discussions regarding Novell. They have worked together in that past >and would present a very imposing opponent to our lackluster BOD.
>
>Waiting to hear about your conversation with SWIB. I've already >spoken with the Milwaukee office (just to find out where to go next) >and am pleased you are in contact with someone in Madison.
>
>GO GET 'EM!!!!
>
>
>XXXXXXXXXXX
>
>
>GO PACK!!!
======================================================================
See, there's lot's of things to do Ken <smile>.

Regards,

Joe...

PS: And it doesn't have to take FOREVER, and EVER and EVER either <g>.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News