CYRIX / NSM Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : CYRIX / NSM

NSM 18.27

0.0%

Jul 31 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scott Sterling who wrote (31216)	3/8/1999 1:25:00 PM
From: AB	Read Replies (1) of 33344

Scott, re the bad MII-300. Why immediately blame Cyrix testing for the bad chip? Which vendor was it purchased from? How do you know that it wasn't mishandled by the reseller and/or a customer who returned it after trying to overclock it, etc? Also, I know saving $15 doesn't sound like much, but I work for a co that sells chips to the disk drive industry, and these guys beat on us to shave pennies!! off prices. The OEM's in turn beat on them to shave a few dollars off their prices. I know NSM needs to move along the speed curve, but if they can make money selling $40-$60 chips, then they may still have a future. Remember that AMD seems to need an ASP of about $100 just to break even. Anthony

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next