<<< As I said before, I'm waiting to see the new portal page. Buy on rumor, sell on news. It simply makes no sense to get out now.>>>
Well, depending on how much you're in for.
<<<Several of the web sites they had lined up last time around were turning a profit. You put together ten or twenty of those under a common roof and you should be able to turn an even larger profit. Making money is not a bad business model. >>>
No disagreement from me. Nevertheless, promoting Bianca's as one of their sites wasn't exactly the smartest thing they could have done.
<<There are plenty of second and third tier web sites out there catering to small audiences and customer segments, but still making a profit. Currently, they are working in isolation, however. What's wrong with bringing them together under a common umbrella, thus giving each of them advertising space they probably wouldn't be able to afford on their own?>>>
Nothing at all, now ask Avie Glazier why he didnt' pursue that avenue rather than taking a dump all over investors.
<<<Of course until we see the new portal page, what either of us thinks about it is sheer speculation. That's why I'm waiting to see the portal page, because then I'll know.>>>
True, but it's painfully obvious that Zap's goal is to try and jump on the internet bandwagon and make some bucks for their executive staff.
Works well for the short term but everything eventually comes around to the bottom line and I don't see anything that would remotely shows me a decent revenue model.
<<If you want out of ZAP, your broker is only a mouse click away.>>
Actually, if you read any of my posts before they pulled out of their last strategy you will find that I was on their side. It was their own press releases that finally confirmed that there was something "fishy" going on. |
