Microvision (MVIS) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Microvision (MVIS)

MVIS 0.862

-5.5%

Dec 29 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JDN who wrote (2076)	3/8/1999 3:39:00 PM
From: mark calder	Read Replies (2) of 7720

JDN, don't misunderstand me please, I am very biased. I hope that This didn't cloud my thinking when I read the book. The Lawsuit was mentioned in the first years annual report. It has never to my knowledge been mentioned in the following years report. I can only assume that it was either settled or thrown out. From what I have read and from my own due diligence, I discounted the suit as frivilous. One of the problems with the whole setup has been the total hatred of the Microvision management by the personnel of the HIT lab. It was their belief that Rutkowski and company would fail and they would get the technology back. They are very bitter at the phenomenal progress that has been made by the scientists at Microvision. There have been many breakthroughs in the basic technology that has kept Casey Tegreen (the patent attorney) very busy. Naturally these breakthroughs have not been shared with the lab and are the exclusive property of Microvision. Furness had a great Idea, he is a very innovative designer, but unfortunately he is a very poor businessman.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next