Jon,
Re your 2899, while I agree conceptually with the fact that all companies involved with technology have legal and patent squabbles, I don't think that being on the backburner is reason not to investigate.
I think that CTRL, Inc., in particular, looks at potential dollar signs in its corporate eyes. Let's say, for example, that Mr. Roche hasn't done much of anything over the years to develop the product. But, all of a sudden, there is a major increase in interest in MRPS stock based upon the ULTRAPHONICS trademark of a product that CTRL Systems, Inc. may (or may not) have been involved. Well, if Mr. Roche could file a lawsuit (and win) then his company could just have a chance to gain money with no effort at all outside of filing and pursuing a successful lawsuit.
Am I wrong?
Vic |
