Dear ______,
If you have the forebearance and intestinal fortitude to make your way through the megamillion frothy and venomous postings on this thread, you may be able to glean some insight. I have never been one to suffer through day time soapies so I guess that's why I haven't been turned on to the "fix" that this thread supposedly provides for it's "addicts."
Janice is supposedly an art historian that manages to spend every waking hour (and sleeping hour) on the computer supposedly "protecting the investing public" while at the same time slaughtering anyone that trys to express themselves contrary to her perception and interpretation. She claims to not owning any of this stock, although I question what her motives are, due to her time spent here and the hostily and vengeance that she addresses certain posters with. I would like to believe that Janice's heart is in the right place (sometimes, kinda) in desiring to protect investors from supposedly bad investments, and "some" of her due dilligence is right on, but I think she goes too far above and beyond the call of duty, and is waaaayyyy too hostile, to be considered ulterior motive-free.
Beyond this, go fiqure my friend. I think it is strange that a busy art historian has so much time to make hostile, persnippity little condescending smirks and pick fights all day in chat rooms under the guise of "due dilligence."
Outta here for now,
Busy day today.
Best regards,
Cindy |
