Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: kash johal who wrote (52200)	3/9/1999 8:19:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) of 1572208

Kash, It would have made eminent sense to have a 0.18 micron k-3 by now (and in Cu it be running at 500-650 Mhz today). Jerry and Atiq described their latest speedpath fix, as correcting a situation which caused yields at 300MHz and 400MHz- but not 350 MHz. This implies a race condition. Race conditions do not scale to different processes as you would expect. In any CPU design, porting the layout to a new process can take a year or more. You are making very coarse assumptions, but the engineers at AMD have to live in the real world of very tiny details which can make or break a product. There is no reason to assume that K6-2 or K6-3 could be running any faster than they are now. Scumbria

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next