SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TideGlider who wrote (21274)3/12/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: Janice Shell  Read Replies (3) of 26163
 
Oh look!! Spidey the Teppichfresser is at it again, but as usual doesn't have the guts to post his rubbish in the appropriate place:

To: Janice Shell (209 )
From: Spider Valdez
Friday, Mar 12 1999 2:42PM ET
Reply # of 218

"....WellRich itself sold no stock to anyone; it was to receive finders' fees on sales eventually made by AZNT. The two parties subscribed to a contract outlining the obligations of each to the other. We don't have a copy of the original, but the terms of this agreement, signed on 26 February 1997, are contained in WellRich's Petition to Compel Arbitration:...."

thank you first off for admitting wellrich solicited stock w/o being a broker/dealer & validating the sec concerns & actions re: wellrich. secondly, you state you "don't have a copy" of the agreement, but forensics experts do dear, lololol ! beyond that, aslo taylor claims to have dissolved wellrich as a corporation in april of '97 & since wellrich was functioning as a boiler room w/o a b/d, the contract with aznt was null & void. refer to USA vs. WellRich. as for the arbitration & award. we will ignore that you claimed there was an arbitration & "judgement" against aznt several months ago which you claimed was in your posession & that you were "scanning" it to post on si, forgiving that. can you show us the original complaint? you said you could not. can you show us any reciept of service? aznt was never served. now the matter must show to have meriit in federal court where aznt wants it litigated. are you starting to see how things are unfolding? when do you think the defamation case & libel suit will be filed dear? have fun defending all your dribble in a court of law, it ain't si honey!

spider
btw, touch of nature is now 'natures taste' & comes in a much larger bottle, in GRANULATED FORM for the same price of sugar per oz. BUT!..it is twice as sweet, meaning it will last twice as long!


-----------------------

but forensics experts do dear, lololol !

OOOOOOHHH NOOOOO!! Don't tell me those pesky forgers have been up to their old tricks!!! Really, Spidey, you are funnier than funny. You really expect people to believe that EVERY damn piece of paper bearing any relation to AZNT has been "forged" or "fabricated". Yeah, spidey, sure. Let 'em wrap you in the wet sheets now... No no, don't try to fight, it'll only make it worse...

now the matter must show to have meriit in federal court where aznt wants it litigated.

"Wants to" ain't quite the same as "succeeds in doing". Haven't you been informing us Nasty Bashers that we were gonna be sued since last OCTOBER??? You really ought to understand that that isn't gonna happen, Spidey. Why is it that you don't? We've explained many times.

are you starting to see how things are unfolding?

Oh yes, Gary. You're the one who doesn't. I've said it several times now: I've forgotten more about AZNT and its dealings than you've ever known.

Once again: as you've said so many times, you are "very stupid guy". You're gonna pay quite a price for your hubris and your greed, if I'm not mistaken.

And one last point: if AZNT plans to sell ToN for half the price of sugar, effectively, how exactly do they expect to make any kind of profit? Sugar's dirt cheap.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext