SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AJ Berger who wrote (3063)3/12/1999 6:01:00 PM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (1) of 12823
 
Will Bells or AOL offer broadband DSL?

news.com



Bells stumble over broadband AOL
By John Borland
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
March 11, 1999, 4:00 p.m. PT

news analysis America Online and the Baby Bells need each other--but their new high-speed Internet
partnerships could undermine the telephone companies' broadband ambitions.

The big local phone companies have been famously unsuccessful at building thriving ISP services over the last few years, while Net companies like AOL have captured millions of dial-up subscribers.

The regional Bells want to upset this balance of power, however, as consumers increasingly look for high-speed Net services. The most ambitious telcos say they want their own brands to dominate the consumer broadband market--to the extent that AOL has overshadowed its dial-up competitors.

"They've been non-performers in the ISP market," said Abhi Chaki, senior analyst at Jupiter Communications.
"In the broadband market they want to make sure that isn't repeated."

The Bells know they have a long way to go. Subscribers to cable modem services such as AT&T-controlled
@Home far outnumber users of digital subscriber lines (DSL), the telco alternative that allows copper phone wires to handle high-speed Net traffic.

For this reason, most analysts say that partnering with AOL, which can upgrade millions of its users to the technology, was critical. Bell Atlantic signed its marketing deal with AOL in January, while SBC Communications inked a deal with the ISP today. US West, the other leader in DSL rollouts, says it is in talks with the online service for its own broadband pact.

But some analysts also predict that broadband AOL is the death knell for the telcos' hopes of building powerful consumer Internet brands. By allowing AOL to offer competitively priced DSL service--about $42 a month for high-speed access and AOL content--the telcos undermine their ability to attract consumers to their own brands.

Forrester Research forecasts that as much as 90 percent of all DSL consumers by the year 2004--and probably earlier than that--will be accessing the Net through America Online, and not a Baby Bell-branded ISP.

The telcos themselves will eventually see the writing on the wall, and step back from their attempts to create mass-market front-ends to the service, predicted Forrester analyst Bruce Kasrel.

"Using AOL to be their broadband ISP is a smart move, so they don't get distracted into becoming content providers" Kasrel said. "That's not what they do well. They know that."

Still early in the game
The telcos are far from giving up, and still say that their own broadband names can coexist with and even succeed next to America Online.

Bell leaders in DSL have even unveiled early marketing campaigns for Net service. Bell Atlantic is touting its "InfoSpeed" service. US West highlights
its "Megabit" service and says it is evolving into a company that offers "Webtone" as well as dial tone.

SBC executives say they are working on a brand name for their DSL service,
which will be the focus of a high-profile marketing campaign later this year.

Meanwhile, a group of Baby Bells has been in talks with PointCast to create
a consortium that would offer a @Home-like high-speed Net service in different areas of the country. A
successful outcome to those talks looks increasingly unlikely, but the initial campaign underscores the Bells'
interest in creating their own high-profile Net brands.

Chaki said the Bells are committed to being viewed as more than just the plumbing that brings consumers a
broadband Net. "That was the reason behind the whole PointCast talks," he said. "They wanted to add value to
their DSL services."

Telcos plans for broadband brands
SBC executives say they are "absolutely" committed to keeping their broadband brand name strong in the areas
where they offer DSL.

The company will roll out the new service as part of a high-profile marketing campaign later this year, said
Steve Dimmitt, vice president of marketing for Pacific Bell, SBC's California subsidiary.

The company is also actively looking for content partners to help fill the front end of the service, Dimmitt said.
Among the companies SBC has talked to is Intertainer, the video on demand service that provides US West with
video services in several trials.

US West, which is also among the leaders in DSL rollouts, appears to be less committed to having its ISP claim
independent market share. It instead has focused on branding its "Megabit" DSL service in much the way Intel
has pursued the "Intel Inside" strategy, selling access to ISPs with the condition that they retain the Megabit
brand.

"The Megabit brand is very important to the company," said Steve Bartholet, director of US West's Megabit
marketing division. "It's about creating an image of the company that is seriously into data communications."

Nevertheless, US West has been identified as one of the key players in trying to create the PointCast service,
and is moving ahead aggressively with plans to offer video content over its own branded DSL services.

The success of these efforts will depend on the Bells pursuing a marketing strategy that is more
coherent and targeted than past dial-up ISP efforts. Also critical will be developing relationships with
video and other broadband content partners that give consumers a reason to use their services, instead
of sticking with the familiar AOL, analysts said.

But backing off and letting AOL and other ISPs lead the drive for consumers' loyalty would be a
better--and probably inevitable--alternative, Kasrel said. "An AOL broadband service could be a very
compelling way to combat cable modems' inroads," he noted.

The Bells themselves have a history of trying, and then retreating from ambitious consumer Internet
goals, Kasrel added.

"They'll put a crappy effort up, and then even if its priced competitively, [the services] will suffer," the
analyst said. "I think it will fail. They're not good at that."

Related news stories
• AOL teams with SBC for high-speed pipes March 11, 1999
• AOL's Case calls for open cable access February 17, 1999
• Will broadband determine Yahoo's future? January 21, 1999
• AOL, Bell Atlantic raise speed limit January 13, 1999

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext