From the casual observer, one would have to look at this article in a different light. It almost looks like it is describing the situation on RMIL and a certain psychic cop(?)
**********************
"What is that saying about throwing stones when you live in a glass house?"
"Guess who may be breaking the law while pretending to be the defender of the people."
Another stock activist?
"All the while Lichtman passing himself off as an independent and impartial stock picker when, in fact, he was nothing more than a paid pitch man for DRIP."
Sound familiar?
"It even seems to us that Lichtman might have been disclosing inside information over the web before it was announced."
What about the $5 million, the $10 million. Who broke that "news" from the company? What about the investor from Arizona? What about the private email list?
"Recently, there has been a little short-selling activity and some profit taking from investors who got in last year at much lower prices, but it seems to be offset by about an equal amount of new buying at this time, resulting in a fairly stable price range. If the company lists on AMEX, short sellers may lose interest since the exchange's short selling rules are more restrictive than the OTCBB's."
A short squeeze? Move to the AMEX? Where did I hear that before?
"No response from Lichtman, only the sound of air escaping from the stock that he pumped up with such fervor. We have looked through the whole thread of this site for Lichtman's disclosure, none could be found. We looked at his profile he filed on the site and no Disclosure. We did of course find that he was the investor relations guy for this brick."
At least you are not gone, yet. We were worried there for a few months. I do respect that you have been up front with your phone number openly listed.
"We asked him if he was paid to hype DRIP. Lichtman proudly said "Yes, I was paid only cash!". We then asked him why he didn't disclose that over the web. His tone changed. He told us, "What the hell are you trying to do?". We said we wanted to know why he didn't have to disclose but others do. His answer , "Go F&*% yourself"."
Strange, that response is similar to how you respond to certain individuals who don't completely support your ideals.
*******
You have to admit Riley, the nays have some pretty strong points against you. I would be very careful about what and how you say things on SI when you still live in your glass house. Then again, if you have done nothing wrong in your eyes, only the court system and the SEC will be able to determine the outcome.
IMO,
-Ken- |
