SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bill F. who wrote (51792)3/13/1999 2:37:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
Bill, Nope, it was definitely Padilla, who is good. I am talking circa 1983. Padilla left Paineless in 1984.

I rmemeber Benderly so well because he was bearish on bonds at the time I was buying them hand over fist for a new mutual fund. When rates were 14%, my bosses were saying, "please, don't take risk. Kidder says rates are up forever." I ignored them of course, which is my normal reaction. Then, after more than two years of a spectacular bull market in which my fund's assets grew from zero to ten billion bucks, the same guys ordered me to be "more aggresstive with bonds at 7.25%, because Laffer says they are going to 2%." That time I had to quit to prove my point. <g> But any time Benderly or Laffer come into the conversation, I have to trash them. And it is really not their fault. It is my bosses who believed the garbage. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext