So what you are saying is. It's okay to promote or attack stocks when being paid by the Companies or outsiders in question, and not inform the public of said compensation or benefits received from the company or outsiders.
Well the SEC says that's illegal, and if you receive said benefits from the Companies, then this must be made public knowledge in the form of disclosure. Something that it seems that The Stink Detective may be guilty of.
So, have you received any benefit for the promote, and or attacks on stocks? If you have never received a benefit for attacking a stock, or promoting them, why do you find it hard to believe that others do so with said benefits?
RG
PS. I have never received any said benefits from any person, firm, and or company for my owning or talking about stocks that I do own. I welcome any evidence that proves otherwise.
-
To: Hogger (21310 )
From: Janice Shell Saturday, Mar 13 1999 10:21PM ET
Reply # of 21322
Well, Hoggie, here's a question for you, and again, of course, it's one that's been asked many times before:
How often have Stock Detective's warnings proved accurate? And how many times inaccurate? Their record is in fact excellent.
lolololol, naturally!! You just can't get over CYGS, can you? |
