SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SEC Investigations /Lawsuits - Let's keep SI stds up
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: QuietWon who wrote ()3/14/1999 12:34:00 PM
From: QuietWon   of 117
 
DP clause of the 14th Amt ---- > the CT subscribes to a narrow reading of this. DP is simply a procedural right, a right to a fair procedure (5th Amendment) and that's all. DP process is not a substantial right, therefore it can't be used to strike down a law against Free Speech because that is a sub reading of that clause.

a) Substantial ------- > If a law is directed to telling you how you have to live your life then that is a sub issue. NOTE: the CT at this time thought that sub issues are not covered by the DP clause.

b) Procedural ---- > The law that is created is valid, and you are accused of violating that law, and at trial you are not allowed to cross examine a witness, that is procedural and the DP clause at this time protects you.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News