SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Knighty Tin who wrote (51905)3/14/1999 6:38:00 PM
From: Monty Lenard  Read Replies (1) of 132070
 
MB, I may have discovered what is really happening in this market and why the bears have been wrong being bearish. <g>

panopticon.csustan.edu

HYPERREAL FINANCE

Abstract

In both our scholarship and our society, we are wedded to the notion that the financial economy (of money) exists for, refers to, and is meaningless without the so-called real economy (of things). But what if "real" finance (finance which refers to the real economy), is in fact "hyperreal" finance (finance which refers to nothing but itself)? What if financial transactions are not moves in an economic (real) game but moves in a non-economic (hyperreal) game? In a post-modern society, the traditional economic (real) role of finance has become marginal. To understand finance and to develop effective public policy regarding financial markets, one must acknowledge its more cultural (hyperreal) role.

Once upon a time a group of congenial people got together (at a coffeehouse, beside a curb, or under a buttonwood tree in different versions of the story) for a game. They each paid a bit of money for tokens and began to play. The game turned out to be especially interesting and exciting, and it attracted passersby, who asked to join in. They were allowed to do so, but their tokens were a little more expensive than the original tokens because the game had become so desirable. This raised the value of all of the tokens in the game.

There was no guarantee that anyone in the game would be a winner, but with new players steadily boosting the value of tokens, everyone could rationally expect to come out ahead in the long-run. Players could still lose all of their tokens, and if forced out of the game for one reason or another, end up cashing in their tokens for less than they paid for them originally. But as a few new players were always being attracted to the game and as not too many players cashed in tokens to make purchases, the game proceeded happily along, with everyone enjoying the thrill of competition and the prestige of increasingly valuable stacks of tokens.

As it grew, the game attracted journalists and scholars, responding to what had become an insatiable demand by players for more information regarding the game. Government officials also took a keen interest, since such a popular game involving vast sums of tokens had to be regulated for the protection of its participants. Eventually, there were few in society whose lives were not touched by the game in one way or another, and all agreed that the game was indeed a grave matter.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext