Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kevin K. Spurway who wrote (52610)	3/14/1999 10:17:00 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (2) of 1575396

Kevin - Re: <I do believe that ...> It is clear that INTC didn't choose to buy the fab. They paid for it as a result of theft of intellectual properties that was caught, a court decreed punishment for the wrongs they performed. The current question is - Is INTC intentionally short manufacturing the sa chips? That kind of behavior is why justice dept. demanded alternative manufacturing sources for the Alfa series. Should they have demanded alternative sources for all the DEC chips? Should they demand alternate source for all X-86 chips? Is INTC rico liable? 3 strikes your out - how many strikes is this for INTC? tgptndr

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next