SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Catfish who wrote (11948)3/15/1999 3:18:00 AM
From: uu  Read Replies (2) of 13994
 
Darrell:

> The Shah was partly deposed due to an internal Iranian contempt for the "corrupt" west.

Just a point of clarification. The Shah was deposed mostly due to the following:

1. Manipulation of mass population via religion by a few corrupt individuals (namely Khomeini and his gang who were (and continue to be) 1000 times worse than Nazis and how they manipulated the Germans during WW II).

2. Internal corruption which eased that manipulation to take place.

3. Shah's depression during his last 2 years of ruling as he saw how his aids had taken advantage of his trust and spread the corruption in his name. This diminished his leadership to deal with Khomeini's gang decisively

4. A democratic president (namely Jimmy Carter) who had absolutely no knowledge of the Persian culture (or for that matter any culture but his own Southern values) and how people of different countries differ in values when it comes to how they are governed. Carter was an idealistic fool who not only ruined the US values (both at economic level as well as moral level), but also ruined a lot of countires (including Iran) with his idiotic image building slogan of Human Rights! It is interesting that Carter is perhaps the most hated man in Iran not only by the fundamentalist mad religious mullahs governing the country but also by all pro-Shah supporters and all anti Khomeni movements. Both sides blame him for the destruction of Iran!

Now going back to your comment, please do not take me wrong. There is absolutely no question in my mind that Clinton (and democrats) are corrupt and have acted as such. However what bothers me very much is that Republicans of the late 1990's act as if they are the saints sent by god to rescue the nation form the corrupt Democrats!! That is what angers me. Given the same opportunity Republicans are as bad (if not worst) than Clinton (as they have shown before).

I remember the Clinton impeachment hearing. As I saw the republicans and democrats that composed the judicial committe one thing I noticed was very interesting. Practically all republicans were White men christians with basically the same rigid conservative philosophical views, while Democrats cosisted of blacks,whites, men, women, and even a gay! Now I ask you which group represented America better? republicans or democrats?! For a small minority to dictate what is right and worng morally (or otherwise) is as un-American as having a King for the leader of the US!

Both Republicans and Democrats are corrupt. After all that is part of human nature. However I rather have and deal with the corruption of the group that represents the mainstream society and the nation at large rather than the corruption of the group that reflects a very special group of people who think of themselves as the true Americans (namely republicans of the late 1990's).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext