Sid,
My sentiments exactly:
"Steve: That is nice of you to post information about Millenium Bridge, which "may have been the original name for Antaeus". Well, maybe it was, but maybe it wasn't. Is that an official assertion of DCHT, that Antaeus is the same company as Millenium Bridge, or are they not saying that?
Why can't DCHT release the address of this supposed big customer, and its phone number, if it has either? It should also give out the name of at least one officer or director so those who want to see if this promised order is legit can speak with someone about it."
I will admit it, I am an idealist. I believe in the future of the hydrogen economy, and I want to participate in it. But I cannot in good conscience hold shares in a company that engages in continual obfuscation.
Whatever the true nature of the business relationship between Steve Oshinsky and DCHT, the facts concerning Antaeus continue to be swathed in smoke. I thank DoubleOddBuck for the SEC link. They encourage online investors to verify verify verify. So here's this alleged Antaeus contract for bridge work, but none of us can verify that they or the contract actually exist.
DCHT danced around the issue, and H2O directs us to query their website. I refuse to go around a circle like this more than once.
If DCHT is a straight operation, they should give straight, unconvoluted answers to legitimate stockholder questions.
We've been buried in bullshit for over three weeks on this Antaeus chimera. |
