SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Matthew Leo who wrote (92)2/16/1997 6:48:00 PM
From: FMK   of 27311
 
A repeat of my last post again-with a better layout

Revised $ estimates based on latest production information-(stated in previous post)

Line 1 maximum capacity
cellphone cells---------7mln cells/yr x 4.18 watt hr/cell = 29.25 watt-hr/yr
(or) laptop cells------1.5mln cells/yr x 15.5 watt-hr/cell = 22.25 watt-hr/yr

High speed lines maximum capacity (each)
cellphone cells--------21mln cells/yr x 4.18 watt-hr/cell = 87.8 watt-hr/yr
(or) laptop cells-----5.25mln cells/yr x 15.5 watt-hr/cell = 81.4 watt-hr/yr

The popular Sony 18650 cell holds 90 watt-hours per kilogram while VLNC cells
hold over 1.5 times as much. The main difference is due to the 19650's metal case
required to hold liquid. Volumetically, specific energies for liquid and solid electrolyte
are about equal. OEM's are now paying about $2 per watt-hour for the liquid cells.

In his conservative manner, Cal Reed said "We don't know what premium the market
will pay for solid cells, if any" It would seem that given the higher density and
elimination of liquid electrolyte, there should be some premium (5-15%?). I will use the
$2 figure regardless.

From the conf. call Cal Reed still expects line 1 production cells for testing this quarter
and to be production-qualified this summer. He expects line 2 qualification near
yearend or early next year with a 7-12 mln cells/yr rate at yearend.

It seems reasonable that lines 1 and 2 could be in full production by the end of the
fiscal yr(March 31). I will use a .75 factor to allow for holidays and repair shutdowns
etc. With the company's 40% profit goal, This would be $ the rate of production:

Line 1- laptop cells--------22.25 wh/yr x $2/wh x .75 x .4= $13.4 mln/yr
Line 2 - cellphone cells------87.8 wh/yr x $2/wh x .75 x .4 = $50.9mln/yr
-------------------------------total $64.3 mln/21.7 mln sh = 2.96 or $3/sh/yr

After experience with line 2, design for lines 3 and 4 could be finalized simultaneously
and both fully-operational by Summer '98 with the first Hanil-Valence lines in Korea.
The on-line efficiency should increase. I will use .8. Here is an "if all goes well" scenario
( Ireland plant only) for mid '98. Remember the market is such that there should be no
problem selling all that can be produced!

Line 1- 50/50 mix including special orders, more setups, shorter runs etc
-----------laptop cells--------------22.25wh/yr x .5 x $2/wh x .75 x .4 = $6.7mln/yr
-----------cellphone cells------------29.25wh/yr x .5 x $2/wh x .75 x .4 =$8.8mln/yr
Line 2-large OEM order cellphone cells---87.8 wh/yr x $2/wh x .8 x .4 = $56.2mln/yr
Line 3-large OEM order laptop cells-------81.4wh/yr x $2/wh x .8 x .4 = $52.1mln/yr
Line 4-large OEM order cellphone cells---87.8 wh/yr x $2/wh x .8 x .4 = $56.2mln/yr
----------------------------------subtotal---------------------------------$180mln/yr
---operating cost at $1.5mln/mo from conf call---------------------------($18mln/yr)
---Irish govt contribution after $5mln prod shipped ----max $30mln-------$15mln
-----addl expenditures for expansion-guess-------------------------------($25mln/yr)
------taxes - Ireland--- wild guess----------------------------------------($20mln)
-----net profit (neglecting joint ventures)----------$132mln/21.7mln sh = $6.08/sh/yr

Joint venture revenues should show up around mid '98 and there may be more of them
well before then. With a conservative multiple or 10, its easy to see why this could
easily become a $60 stock, even without joint ventures or 6 more prodution lines in the
Ireland plant!

Feedback and comments are welcome. Best regards
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext