Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Clarksterh who wrote (24282)	3/17/1999 12:02:00 AM
From: JMD	Read Replies (2) of 152472

Clark, I know better than to tangle with you, having lost a few previous concatenations, but help me out here. I thought folks ripped off celluloid like hell won't have it, to the tune of some zillions of serious dollars/year. Spot-beaming "Lolita" wrapped in the encapsulated arms of CDMA was supposed to keep the world, and spying pirate voyeurs, safe for democracy, enormously enriching the Q's treasury [or 'honey pot' as Mqrice would have it] in the process. What am I missing? P.S. if you're really the macho techno-dude that I think you are, check out "The Last Mile . . ." thread on SI. We're talking some serious telecom geeks--bring all the 3'en One Oil your slide rule can stand cause you're gonna need it! I hit those guys with my very best stuff [you know, all my post-doctoral wave theory work; didn't figure they'd clue in that my wave theory consisted of salt water, but. . .] Only my resident status as head techno wizard of the Q thread saved what little credibility remained--don't blow my cover if aliens visit home base. :-) SM

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next