Rickmas, you don't have to be clever to make DCHT look bad...
When it issues stock to pay its rent, loses $4.2 Millions in 1998, has a net asset value of some $194,000 and employs tricksters like Dr Harvey, Sir Alexx and H2Oshinsky, all bundled up in the same person to HYPE the value of its stock it looks pretty bad to me.
In fact, with all the negative aspects of this Company, as revealed over a period of time on this Board, I am surprised that there are still people blind enough to hold shares in the company and tout it relentlessly.
Ballard is a far better Company, if only for the simple reason that the last time I looked, it had $440,000,000 in cash in its kitty. If economically viable fuel cells can be developed, I would rather bet on them than on a cash strapped, money losing Company with the worst possible PR/IR I have ever seen.
For your information, I do not hold any share related to the use of hydrogen, as I truly think the only people to make any money out of it for a very long time are going to be the university researchers like you and the shameless promoters like H2Oshinsky.
At least, I am pleased to see that you have toned down your previous unfettered hype without disclosure while being directly or indirectly compensated by DCHT.
Further information on the Company and people involved in it:
#reply-8174874 #reply-8196418 #reply-8238077
#reply-8266295 #reply-8300915#reply-8315669
F. Goelo + + +
|
