SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lhn5 who wrote (21140)3/17/1999 8:40:00 PM
From: J Fieb  Read Replies (1) of 29386
 
The HDS blurb made me go back and read Mr. E. Lees article.....

performancecomputing.com

HDS doesn't want just a SAN. More like this...........

"VI mappings

Fibre Channel turns out to be particularly well-suited for VI, far better
than SCSI or Gigabit Ethernet. The idea behind VI is to have
application-to-application virtual channels that provide low-latency,
high-bandwidth communications. One objective is to synchronize
distributed processing so that processing power can scale smoothly.
Another is to reduce the communications overhead on host
processors so they can run their applications faster.

Virtual Channels are set up by host processors, then left to the
communication system to administer. (It's called "management by
exception" in business.) The communications system should provide
source-socket to destination-socket communication on cue, without
calling on the operating system or host processor. VI also specifies
classes of service including unconfirmed and confirmed delivery. If
we've adequately communicated how Fibre Channel works, it should
be clear that VI's requirements and Fibre Channel's capabilities fit
beautifully. (Fibre Channel's standard for VI mapping is scheduled for
release in mid-1999.)

Where does this lead? VI may be a step toward CANs--compute
area networks. These networks will enable us to scale processing
power the way SANs enable us to scale storage. CANs will require
low-latency communications of many relatively short messages, while
SANs require wide-bandwidth communications of much larger blocks
of data. Fibre Channel is the one communication technology that
supports both effectively. In fact, a single fabric can support both
requirements concurrently. "


Hopefully this will help sell the FC technology..

Go HDS.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext