SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (39240)3/18/1999 11:22:00 AM
From: Johannes Pilch  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
It seems to me he understood the difference quite nicely. He mentioned a co-workers' wife who had a child at 26 weeks gestation. I have not enough information but it seems something was wrong in the pregnancy (grin). Presumably the woman's prenatal care was such that they were able to nurture the mother and child until its birth instead of, as Dwight has said, “having his brains sucked out.”

Perhaps I am wrong, but when Dwight mentioned that it was a “Good thing his mother decided to keep him, rather than having his brains sucked out,” it signaled to me he spoke all along of the wonders of modern prenatal care, wonders that would allow an unborn child to be nurtured such that at 26 weeks it could be born, this, instead of “having his brains sucked out.”
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News