SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : BRO-X MINERALS (C.BXO)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maps who wrote (308)3/18/1999 12:14:00 PM
From: the Chief  Read Replies (2) of 363
 
Hi maps. does this mean that we have to pay 10c per share that we already own to make this work

Thats the way I read it. This will result in the company getting enough money (assuming 1/3 of shares are tendered for this deal) to pay Bresea.

Devil's advocate position

You pay .10c per share for shares you already own. You have the chance of owning shares in a company for .10c that then has 21,000,000 shares O/S (assuming all tendered) with $1.4 million in the bank (.10x 21mm = $2.1mm - .75mm = $1.4mm)

Each tendered share has a warrant attached to it for .10c

So FD would be 42,000,000 shares. If all warrants were exercised than the company would have $3.5mm in the bank

However, I believe the likeihood is that if only the $750K was raised then the company would likely be inactive until they find a business to conduct. As soon as they do, they will need money so would then performing the "old reverse split" and once aqain we would all feel the huge sucking sensation on our wallet!! A feeling we are all quite familiar with!!

So my intention is to talk to Devlin and pose these scenarios to him on the phone. When I decide what I am going to do, I will let everyone know what and why I have chosen this course!!!

the Chief
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext