SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: mineman who wrote (1927)3/19/1999 1:26:00 AM
From: Tom Cat  Read Replies (2) of 5821
 
mineman,
the last two holes were not good:
1. 98-09, nothing to brag about in this one
2. 99-04 should be a hell of a lot better based on their model at their web site, this IMO is a big surprise that the high grade intercepts were so thin and the overall grade for the 50+ meters was also under 1%
If NWI does not find a decent continuation of the plunge in the next holes, we might see 2.0 tested again.
3. I am really surprised that no-one raised an obvious question, that is how come NWI reported 99-04 and not 99-03?, was 99-03 a dude, and where was it located???.
TC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News