Look, I believe the basis question was whether or not the trading pattern on DGIV looked normal. I have no expertise to offer an informed opinion on the issue, hence I didn't reply to it, although I do have an interest in the topic.
You did, provided Dell as an example and then made some inferences. I looked at your example and, in my opinion, it contained many dissimilarities. How many can you identify? After looking closely at your example, I can see why the issue was raised in the first place.
I do have a hard time telling whether somebody is trying deliberately distort a claim or if they simply fail to understand it. With you, it is especially difficult. You do have a past history of distorting the facts, (It was you who attributed the claim to Digitcom about there being 42 ISP's in Indonesia, when in fact it was made by the US Department of Commerce. I recall correcting you on something else, but am too lazy to look the post up, but will if you like.) But then again, when one tries to do a proportional analysis when one of the values (interday range on the ASK) at issue is zero, a case can be made that they clearly don't understand.
Interesting you introduced the word, "conspiracy" into the dialog. Surely you didn't do so to direct attention away from the point at issue, which was a simple question of whether the trading pattern looked "normal." Again, seemed like a fair question to raise, but I believe it significance will be rendered moot by the company's performance, or lack thereof in the 2nd quarter.
Regards |
