I jsut wonder see thsi NR from THIS week:
techstocks.com
Sure looks like out aupt2 is also stressed in a roundaboutway! DAM !
Chucaupt2(Guzintite)
P.S.- This TTS, Tintina is leveling now at the Buck level. Anyone ever follow this majorly?
a seach found no subject but this recent post on the 15th:
A CANADIAN DIAMOND HUNT "<>"
| Previous | Next | Respond |
To: +Diamond Daze (450 )
From: +Fuller Monday, Mar 15 1999 12:43PM ET
Reply # of 453
TO ALL I am afraid to admit that i have not been following the diamond plays in Alberta. Even though i live in the area.In the end of Feb.
tintina Mines recieved info on mag. survey about there property in the Fort MaKay area. Tintina's stock as well as NSR started going up on much higher volume.Then Birch Mountain Resources took off on high volume. I assumed it was because of info on platinum and gold findings.I have look into it further and found info that there exploration permits covering 205,000 acres,are adjacent to Kennecott/Montello/Redwood joint venture property which has at least one diamondiferous kimberlite intrusion.
Could anyone tell me if there are other pipes in the area of Fort McMurray -- MaKay area since Birch Mountain Resources holds most of the area permits.
Subject 18772
Then on 3-19 1999 BHP ( Broken Hill is well known for it's recent downsize and redoing of their stucture of Operations in OZ and even in my Favorite area- AZ as they withdrew from one OF my favorite Congress Mining District in central AZ a few years back when they a year earlier took over a local- Magma Mining -so I call BHP the lack of attention to detail company co, Ltd!) said the hell with the Oil Sands ( World Oil Glut):
Shell Canada Ltd -
NP says Broken Hill withdraws from Shell Canada project
Shell Canada Ltd SHC
Shares issued 290,171,940 1999-03-18 close $24.8
Friday Mar 19 1999
The National Post reports in its Friday edition that Broken Hill Proprietary Co. Ltd.'s withdrawal from Shell Canada Ltd.'s proposed oil sands project has forced the Canadian company to ramp up talks with potential new partners for the huge development. The move had been anticipated for several months. Shell Canada had already initiated discussions with other companies that could take its place in the Muskeg River Development, which would be located in the oil-rich Athabasca oil sands region of northeastern Alberta. Australian resource conglomerate BHP confirmed on Wednesday it would not participate in Calgary-based Shell Canada's $3.4-billion Alberta oil sands mining, bitumen extraction and synthetic crude operation after the current feasibility study. BHP, which signed on to the project in 1997, is paying 25 per cent of the costs in a $100-million feasibility study. It had been reviewing its slate of international assets under Paul Anderson, its new chief executive and managing director. Shell said it is in discussions with "a large handful" of potential partners, but declined to identify them.
(c) Copyright 1999 Canjex Publishing Ltd.
canada-stockwatch.com
P.S.- I think I am gunna watch SHELL, maybe even go to the seashore for a dip. ( In , I mean, later when the water is hot! )( When Hotta, the Watta is gotta be warmr in the summa, it's the spring in Alberta for dippin now! First day of spring talk- we had frost on the cars! DAM to that.)
|
