I must be missing something too, poor misguided me. I always understood "beating around the bush" to mean a willful refusal to do something, whether answering a question or just getting to the real point of a conversation. IMO, everyone here who owns HGRM -- some of us, on and off since around 26 cents -- would be only too happy to discuss the company's financial statements and earnings projections in excruciating detail, were they available. And there are many, many OTC-BB stocks that don't report, so this is not an uncommon problem. Our frustration, and our willingness to slip into what George very aptly refers to as "light sarcasm," stems from the tantalizing glimpses the company has given us into what many of us believe are stupendous prospects. But "MOST OF US" are sharp enough to understand that we have no legal or even moral right to demand more than the company is willing, or has the manpower or funds, to give us -- at least not right now. Those of us who are seasoned microcap investors accept this as a fair cost of what we believe will ultimately be a substantial reward.
So, in summary, we are decidedly NOT "beating around the bush," and I'm more than a little offended at the imperious allegation that we are. We are patiently waiting for the company to direct us to where the bush is, or even confirm that there is or ever will be a bush at all.
And no, I'm not worried about dilution. |
