SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 40.03-1.3%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Engel who wrote (76967)3/22/1999 12:59:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Paul,

I think it is reasonable to expect K7 FPU performance to be very similar to the 21264 numbers below. The K7 actually appears to have more FPU hardware than the 21264.

In actual testing, the 575 MHz 21264 receives a SPECint95 rating of 30.1 and a SPECfp95 rating of 44.8. For comparison, a 296 MHz UltraSPARC II obtains a SPECint95 score of 13.2 and a SPECfp95 score of 18.4. The Intel Xeon is further below on the scale, with the 400 MHz version receiving a SPECint95 score of 16.3 and a value of 13.2 for floating point performance. It is obvious from these benchmarks that both Sun and Digital value floating point performance much more than Intel.

cetinc.com

Scumbria
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext