EDTA (was GIFT) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT)

EDTA 0.000200

+300.1%

Mar 7 3:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (2258)	3/22/1999 7:38:00 AM
From: GRC	Read Replies (2) of 2383

Actually, I think it will be continuing only at the appellate level (I a presuming EDTA will appeal). The second order says "NONE of the defts has in the past infringed, or is now infringing, any claim of the'643 Patent because no method, system or apparatus of ANY deft includes any of the following limitations of claims 1,29 or 37 of the '643 Patent as set forth in the Court's Claim Construction Order dated 5/13/98 at pp.41-44;" This is neither surprising nor bad. Given the Courts claim ruling last May, It was pretty certain no one infringed. The only way to get that ruling overturned is on appeal, and the case needed to be terminated at the trial level to get to the appeal.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next