SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Mongolia Gold Resources
MGR 21.44-0.2%Dec 19 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave R. Webb who wrote (3279)3/23/1999 8:46:00 PM
From: Phil Jones  Read Replies (1) of 4066
 
Dave, with my last question I had in mind the situation where, even though TD and MAC know MGR's interest in an issue, it's in neither of their interests to raise the issue in court. For instance if the court is looking at whether MAC defaulted on its loan payment, neither TD nor MAC might want to raise the issue of whether the loan could have been legally made in the first place. I believe that in litigation in Canada between two parties, a third party can ask to be added as an interested party to the litigation if the third party's rights might be affected by the outcome. I thought that might be possible in the Mongolian courts. Anyway, this is a moot point since MGR wasn't in fact made a party to the litigation according to your last post. I'm looking forward to learning the outcome.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News