Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Platinum Group Metals (PGMs)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ptaskmaster who wrote (36)	3/24/1999 4:08:00 PM
From: DRT	Read Replies (2) of 529

HLM - no question it is not the grade that the company, the original prospector or NAP for that matter would have anticipated (whether they missed it is the question/perhaps check assays on the original #9 will shed more light on the situation). Bottom line - more work is required to determine the PGM potential of Tib Lake. As for ore grade - I would use the Lac des Iles numbers as a guide. I would want to see either 2% combined PGMs near surface or 4% at depth. It depends on depth, width of intersection and grade. The deeper it is the higher the grade required. If Bushveld is any indication, recent results from MUST would not be considered economic given the depth. DRT

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next