I am not your adversary. The argument is between me and all of them: the brokers, the companies, the market commentators, etc. They are disagreeing with the points I made earlier. The market is following them, not me.
Over the short run the market is always wrong. ALWAYS. It then corrects its error when new information is made available. Unless my true adversaries make new information available, the stock won't move. As all know very well, it isn't what is true that is important, rather it is who says what is true that is. If one of these "whos" reaches the same conclusion that I have, there will be hell to pay. I have called this "expertism" and it is killing the public in all walks of life.
Why not criticize the message rather than the messenger? Did I not say the issue was too complex for immediate readout? Thus, there are plenty of weak points to debate. If you can refute them, then you know that the "whos" won't do a number on the stock, because they can't. it isn't the truth. |
