NPEC - The thread for NEW shareholders of NP Energy Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NPEC - The thread for NEW shareholders of NP Energy

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: J. Williams who wrote (32)	3/25/1999 12:47:00 AM
From: David in Ontario	Read Replies (1) of 228

JW - thanks. Some questions for you if I may :) How do I interpret the assay report? 1. Do the upper two rows for Au and Cu refer to average results across the reported core lengths? 2. Was there no Cu found between 163-238 m? 3. What significance can be attached to 12.86 gm Au/t between 155-158 m. Does this indicate an Au vein? 4. To what extent does 91 m of overburden hinder the viability of an open pit mine? 5. How long does a 50 core sample program take - up to the point of generating a 'site viability' report? Are we just getting started on hole 5 of 50? Did you read this: Message 8506887 Obviously the closer mineralization is found to the surface - the better. Yes - seeing NPEC @ $0.10-0.15 in the near term would be very nice. TIA David.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next