Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 174.01

-0.3%

Nov 14 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ramus who wrote (24605)	3/25/1999 1:19:00 AM
From: JMD	Read Replies (1) of 152472

Walt, Clark, Leland. Great responses guys, and typical of the incredible quality of this thread. Wish to hell I could understand more, but believe that a few crumbs slip through from time to time. Here's one source of my layman's confusion regarding my belief that CDMA had "inherent" resistance to being ripped off. One of my friends was an early car phone adopter. (try maybe 8 or 9 years ago) He used to REGULARLY get phone bills for like two or three thousand dollars because somebody had ripped off his cell phone number using a scanner and then used that number to make calls all over hell's half acre. Then, with CDMA I guess, no problemmo. So from that I assumed that CDMA was "safe". Or is this not relevant to the discussion? Best, Mike Doyle

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next