SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent?
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zardoz who wrote (4825)3/25/1999 6:51:00 PM
From: m.philli  Read Replies (1) of 81019
 
Thanks for answering Hutch.
I admit the word "pyramid" did cross my mind while thinking about this. Kind of like internet stocks-eh. (joke)
As far as storage costs go, We could melt it into one big glob and let the owners on the internet "keep an eye on it" (half joke)
With gold at $290, how much would it cost for a couple of options to buy at say $4-5 hundred, 12 months out.
When I talked about dividend, I meant returning one option to the shareholder to do with as he pleases.
The other option exercised by the company when the price of physical gold (due to demand) has caused a price in the 7-8 hundred range.
Do you think that it might be possible to create enough demand (investor interest)on physical gold to cause it go this high.
Or would the IMF, CENTRAL BANKS, and PRIVATE INVESTORS be willing to sell enough physical to prevent this kind of a rise.

If it did go that high and the options were (sold?)exercised, the capital raised from the option exercise could be used by the company for something constructive. Such as buying a sovereign undeveloped island to be developed as a resort retirement complex, with the physical gold stored there in a structure. Company investors would have priority for immigration/and or residency.
This would provide income on company assets (money made from derivitive), by selling island residential property, businesses and income from the palace/hotel resort.
This would provide the shareholder with security of finances but also security of person.(As on this sovereign island home invasion on old people would be tolerated like drug traffickers in Singapore. Might not be a bad investment for the future?
What do ya think! Not a hope in Hell!?
-mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News