Network Associates (NET) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Network Associates (NET)

NET 214.17

-5.2%

2:41 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (4506)	3/26/1999 2:44:00 AM
From: Wigglesworth	Read Replies (1) of 6021

<<This part of the article is frightening me: Larson said then [Jan 6, 1999]that Network Associates could offset any reduction caused by a restatement with cost cutting and that the company remained comfortable with 1999 earnings estimates. Question to the thread: does this make sense to anyone? ... So why would a rational CEO attempt to cut costs as a response?>> What this thread needs is a fearless leader! Would we want our rep to hide under the table whenever Larson opens his mouth? Our treasured analyst is literally a pussy but Larson's NO pitbull!!! :-) The scary part makes perfect sense to me and seems to be totally harmless. Grammatically, the 'and' conjunction gives enough hint why he might want to cut cost.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next