Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM)

MDMN 0.000001000

-99.0%

Jun 3 1:07 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: coug who wrote (10532)	3/26/1999 9:33:00 AM
From: Mike Gold	Read Replies (1) of 25548

"Well IMO, this is completely opposite.. BECAUSE you can not have an open pit shaped like a "post hole".. Pit walls have to be "laid back at about 45-50 degrees so they will stand.. You end up with a cone... so narrow horizontal demensions with a deep vertical demension results in TREMENDOUS overburden problem if is to be open-pitted.." ???????????????????????????????????????? You rather have them open pit a 100 meter thick interval instead of a 1000 thick interval? That is your logical conclusion! Very funny! I understand your point of having to lay back the edges of the open pit but your carry your example too for. In this case, they would likely have a steep three sided quarry and not a cone. Overburden on the missing side of the quarry would need to be removed but not the "TREMEDOUS" overburden that you tout to scare people with. The missing side would likely not be overbuden at all-but actually mostly composed of the surrounding-underlying porphyry ore. Perhaps you should actually make an attempt to find out what the geologists say about how Lipangue will be mined economically instead of groundless speculations?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next