Fair enough. We were basing our comments on your postings from November in which you stated that if and when the stock price reached $5, you would be granted XX number of shares. Those were your words, not ours. A 10-1 reverse split was mentioned, however since the price of BCMD stock went below 50 cents, a 10-1 wouldn't be enough to push it over $5. All of a sudden the reverse split goes to 12-1 which WOULD then push the price after split to over $5. And since RELISTING on Nasdaq does NOT REQUIRE a $5 stock price, what other explanation makes sense? Of course we hope you are right about the reverse, however in my 15+ years of investing and my 18 years of owning several businesses, I have seen a few reverse splits in some of my stock picks, and not ONCE has any of them EVER recovered. Here's to hoping BCMD will be different.
There is nothing wrong with questioning what is happening to OUR money, and if you feel that there is, then you have no business being involved in a public offering. As for the lawsuit you mention, well I agree with you 100%. But please don't confuse those of us who simply want answers, to those losers who are seeking to blame YOU for THEIR ERRORS. |
