It ain't Clinton
or
It ain't Yeltsin
It's Milosevic.
Serbia is well armed.
It's not about the past, it is not about technology.
It is about what is happening right now, the current framework.
As international accord grows, fighting will get worse.
NATO leaders are correct, that is my opinion.
Milosevic is undergoing a dramatic reduction in his ability to wage war, thanks to NATO. The program I have seen laid out will be very expensive and significant capital will flee.
Yeltsin is walking a thin line back home. Thanks to the new information infrastructure, most people with an interest will be able to see that it isn't an American action, even if they agree that it may be an American initiative. The UN, always apathetic and distant, chides NATO, not Clinton, for being the bully boy. Yeltsin is losing it, the old regime really is gone, along with the Wall, that appears to coming clear to him now.
I think it is just another facet of a growing trend towards effecting change, rather than letting it affect us. It is easy to not act. Acting as you are able, is the final step, taken only after continual scorning.
No, it ain't Clinton, it ain't Yeltsin, it is a complete disregard for might and complete scorn for international accord.
Milosevic has caused this
Serbia has caused this
You do realize that I am only adding rhetoric, the bombs continue to drop, each target adding millions of dollars in debt and reconstruction, cutting lines of communication, severing transportation arteries, pruning military and manufacturing limbs, cutting into critical centers, diminishing the Serbian military machine, piece by piece.
Good. |
