SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 89.88-3.1%11:19 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: unclewest who wrote (17890)3/27/1999 8:25:00 AM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
uncle, it might be good if we had an IP lawyer on board of this thread, since I think your assumption that MU can get a better royalties deal than the other DRAM people might not be correct. I have a vague recollection that in a case like RMBS, where the technology is licensed not on an exclusive basis, the structure of royalties has to be substantially the same for all participants in a given "fied of use". Namely, if the technology is licensed for memory in PC's and license were offered at 1.7% royalties, MU cannot get a break and pay only 1%.

INTC was an original investor in RMBS and may have priority rights, but I am not sure they can transfer these rights to a company like MU in which they'll have only 6%.

Once again, this is "vague recollection" and it would be great if an IP lawyer could comment on this for us.

Zeev
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext